QUESTIONS ON CREATING AN INNOVATIVE MOTIVATIONAL ENVIRONMENT IN THE VOCATIONAL TRAINING SYSTEM

Konstantin Vasil’evich ROCHEV, Sergey Alekseevich POLISHCHUK, Dmitriy Sergeevich MARCHENKO

K. V. Rochev et al. / News of the Ural State Mining University. 2018. Issue 4(52), pp. 135-142 

Relevance. Evaluation and stimulation of labor are one of the most important components of management, since the effectiveness of work and competitiveness of the organization as a whole depend on them to the greatest extent.
Purpose of the work. The aim is to review some methods of evaluating the results of labor activity from the standpoint of their application in the vocational training system and implementation in the index system of labor assessment.
Tasks. To form a systematic approach to stimulating a university team, propose and evaluate an index method of measuring work results based on a system approach, investigate the work of these models in the operation of information systems for individual segments of the university, determine the main directions for improving the developed incentive system based on the results of its testing and analysis of the behavior of personnel and student groups in the conditions of operation of this system.
Subject: working activity assessment.
Study object: personnel and student groups in the field of vocational education.
Results and their application. The main modern approaches and theories of labor motivation are considered, their implementation when developing the incentive system in the professional education is noted. The stages of fomation of the motivational environment in the university complex and the support of incentives on the key principles of the systems approach and theories of labor motivation are presented. The application of the developed automated system to the assessment of activities and stimulation of students and teachers in the field of higher and secondary vocational education is described. The key features provided by the developed system are indicated.
Conclusion. The value of the research lies in the proposed approaches and methods for evaluating the performance of various segments of the higher education institutions. Additional relevance to the research is given by the creation of an information complex consisting of incentive systems for teachers, staff and students.

Keywords: index system, index-rating system, labor incentives, key performance indicators, financial incentives, quality assessment at the university, informational support of education, university.

 REFERENCES

1. Alderfer С. P. 1969, An Empirical Test of a New Theory of Human Needs. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, vol. 4, issue 2, pp. 142–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90004-X
2. Herzberg F. I. 1987, One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review. Sep/Oct, vol. 65, issue 5, pp. 109–120. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ca2a/a2ae02ac5b738b55b12b7324fac59571b1c1.pdf
3. Vroom V. H., MacCrimmon K. R. 1968, Toward a stochastic model of managerial careers. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 26–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391260
4. Ilyasov F. N. 2012, Schedule of charges, the system of grades based on the law of Weber. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny [Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes journal], no. 6 (112), pp. 128–135. (In Russ.) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18327955
5. Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. 2003, Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazateley. Ot strategii k deystviyu [The balanced scorecard. Translating strategy into action]. Moscow, 304 p. https://www.pwc.ru/ru/training/assets/balanced-scorecard.pdf
6. Klochkov A. K. 2010, KPI i motivatsiya personala: polnyy sbornik prakticheskikh instrumentov [KPI and staff motivation: complete collection of practical tools]. Moscow, 170 p. ISBN 978-5-699-37901-9.
7. Rabinovich M. I., Stepanova E. Yu. 2009, Design of typology of rating conformably to the evaluation of lecturer's activities and departments for the system of gratuity and moral incentive of professional activity at the university. Universitetskoye upravleniye praktika i analiz [Journal University Management: Practice and Analysis], no. 3 (61), pp. 23–28. (In Russ.) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=13083945
8. Agafonova E. A. 2008, Interrelation of estimation of the quality of education in the university and stimulation student learning activities. Vestnik vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta [Herald of Vyatka State University], no. 2–1, pp. 161–167. (In Russ.) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11686675
9. Grivennaya E. N., Starostenko I. N. 2011, Mathematical model of a rating evaluation of professional activity of a teacher of a higher educational institution. Yurist-Pravoved [The scientific-theoretical and information-methodological journal “Jurist-Pravoved”], no. 5 (48), pp. 7–12. (In Russ.) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18877994
10. Kupera A. V. 2005, Stimulation of the activities of university teachers. Izvestiya Dal’nevostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta. Ekonomika i upravleniye [The bulletin of the Far Eastern Federal University. Economics and Management], no. 3, pp. 113–124. (In Russ.) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11779941
11. Rybakova L. E. 2010, Features and consequences of motivation and stimulation of work in higher education in the context of its innovative development. Aktual’nyye problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii [Topical issues of socio-economic development of Russia], no. 4, pp. 94–101. (In Russ.) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15564334
12. Goncharenko L. P., Ponomarev M. A. 2009, Development of a rating system for students (graduates) of a university as a means of encouraging cooperation between universities and commercial organizations. Ekonomicheskiy analiz: teoriya i praktika [Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice], no. 3 (132), pp. 8–14. (In Russ.) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11675314
13. Antonelly C. 2018, Knowledge exhaustibility and Schumpeterian growth. The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 43, issue 3, pp. 779–791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9599-3
14. Coccia M. 2018, Optimization in R&D intensity and tax on corporate profits for supporting labor productivity of nations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 43, issue 3, pp. 792–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9572-1