Issue 1(45), 2017

DOI 10.21440/2307-2091-2017-1-27-31

Forecasting of hydrocarbon potential with a new approach to seismic inversion pdf

T. R. Akhmedov

The article is devoted to forecasting of hydrocarbon potential of the geological section using seismic inversion. The aim of our research is to develop a new approach to the seismic inversion, to determine the place of projected well location. The article briefly reviews existing in the world practice methods of seismic inversion, among which AVO data inversion method stands out. All these methods have one drawback – using the data of well logging (WL) in the final stage of processing, and scientists consider that the processed seismic data has optimum quality. Even if it has a good quality, it is evident that its resolution is much lower. We eliminated these drawbacks in our approach, and we used WL data in the processing of seismic data in order to improve the signal/noise ratio. Software package "AZERI" processes and interprets materials of seismic prospecting and WL, as well as provides seismic inversion. This article contains a brief description of the developed algorithms and programs based on it, which we named "AZERI". The developed method of seismic inversion was applied on one of the areas of the Apsheron
Peninsula of Azerbaijan. After showing the outline of studied area, we give the main results of the use of "AZERI". We divided studied cut to the upper part, including precipitation covering the Miocene sediments, and the lower part, covering zone of abnormally high pore pressure (AHPP), which includes Miocene deposits, for the upper part the areas where AR (apparent resistivity) is above 10 ohm-meters are high-resistant, and for the lower part these are the areas with AR higher than 2 ohm-meters (2). The obtained data leads to the conclusion that the most appropriate place for laying of the projected new well is the point of intersection of lines 132 and 368 of 3D seismic prospecting, since the interpretation of the seismic inversion data using PRIZMA package showed that the oil-bearing part of Kale suite at this point covers the depth interval of 4060–4115 m with total capacity of this interval being about 15 m. Under this interval, Miocene deposits also are oil-bearing.

Keywords: 3D seismic prospecting; seismic inversion; vertical seismic profiling (VSP); acoustic logging (AL); abnormally high pore pressure (AHPP); interpretation; Oligocene; Miocene; Kalinskaya suite.


REFERENCES

1. Ampilov Yu. P. 2004, Seysmicheskaya interpretatsiya: opyt i problemy [Seismic interpretation: experience and problems], Moscow, 277 p.
2. Aziz Kh., Settari E. 1982, Matematicheskoe modelirovanie plastovykh sistem [Mathematical modeling of reservoir systems], London.
3. Astaf’eva N. M. 1996, Veyvlet-analiz: osnovy teorii i primery primeneniya [Wavelet analysis: basic theory and applications examples]. Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk [Successes of physical sciences], vol. 166 no. 11, pp. 1145–1170.
4. Baryshev Yu. A. 2001, Prognoz produktivnosti terrigennykh kollektorov po dinamicheskim parametram otrazhennykh voln na Verkhnechonskoy ploshchadi [The productivity forecast of the terrigenous reservoirs by the dynamic parameters of reflected waves at the Verkhnechonsk area]. Geofizika [Russian Geophysics], no. 2, pp. 27–32.
5. Kondrat’ev I. K., Bondarenko M. T., Kamenev S. P. 1996, Dinamicheskaya interpretatsiya dannykh seysmorazvedki pri reshenii zadach neftegazovoy geologii [Dynamic interpretation of seismic data in solving problems of Petroleum Geology]. Geofizika [Russian Geophysics], no. 5–6, pp. 41–47.
6. Koryagin V. V., Sakharov Yu. P. 1998, Matematicheskoe modelirovanie v seysmorazvedke [Mathematical modeling in the seismic prospecting], Moscow.
7. Mitrofanov G. M., Nefedkina T. V., Bobryshev A. N. et al. 2001, Ispol’zovanie Proni-fil’tratsii s tsel’yu vydeleniya perspektivnykh zon pri razrabotke mestorozhdeniy UV [Using Prony filtration to isolate promising areas in the development of hydrocarbon fields]. Geofizika. Spetsial’nyy vypusk k 50-letiyu Khantymansiyskgeofiziki [Russian Geophysics, Special edition for the 50th anniversary of JSC “Khanty-Mansiysk Geophysics”], pp. 92–100.
8. Voskresenskiy Yu. N. 2002, Sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya metodov analiza amplitud seysmicheskikh otrazheniy dlya prognozirovaniya zalezhey uglevodorodov [Status and prospects of development of seismic reflection amplitude analysis methods to predict hydrocarbon deposits]. Geologiya, metody poiskov, razvedki i otsenki mestorozhdeniy toplivno-energeticheskogo syr’ya [Geology, methods of prospecting, exploration and evaluation of deposits of fuel and energy raw materials], Moscow, vol. 4–5, 77 p.
9. Kopilevich E. A., Afanas’ev M. L. 2007, Novye vozmozhnosti geologicheskoy interpretatsii dannykh seysmorazvedki [New features of the geological interpretation of seismic data]. Geologiya nefti i gaza [Oil and gas geology], no. 5.
10. Nikitin A. A. 2001, Teoriya i metody vydeleniya slabokontrastnykh ob”ektov v geofizicheskikh polyakh [Theory and methods of allocation of low-contrast objects
in the geophysical fields]. Geofizika [Russian Geophysics], no. 2, pp. 9–18.
11. Dobrynina V. M. 2003, Interpretatsiya rezul’tatov geofizicheskikh issledovaniy neftyanykh i gazovykh skvazhin [Interpretation of results of geophysical explorations of oil and gas wells], Moscow.
12. Akhmedov T. R. 2016, O geologicheskoy effektivnosti seysmorazvedki pri izuchenii ne antiklinal’nykh lovushek Azerbaydzhana raznogo tipa [On the geologic efficiency of seismic prospecting in the study of non-anticlinal traps of different types in Azerbaijan]. Izvestiya UGGU [News of the Ural State Mining University], pp. 41–45.
13. Kondrat’ev O. K. 2002, Avtomatizirovannye sistemy otsenki kachestva seysmogramm i volnovykh seysmicheskikh razrezov OGT [Automated quality assessment systems of seismograms and wave seismic sections CDP]. Geofizika, Spetsial’nyy vypusk [Russian Geophysics, Special issue], pp. 3–12.
14. Sheriff R., Geldart L. 1987, Seysmorazvedka. Obrabotka i interpretatsiya dannykh [Seismic exploration. Processing and interpretation of data], Moscow, 400 p.
15. Pustarnakova Yu. A., Akhmetova E. R. 2002, Iskusstvennaya neyronnaya set’ kak instrument prognozirovaniya geologicheskikh parametrov po seysmicheskim atributam i dannym bureniya [Artificial neural networks as a tool for predicting the geological parameters on seismic attributes and drilling data]. Geofizika. Spetsial’nyy vypusk [Russian Geophysics, Special issue], pp. 117-120.
16. 2007, Wold Oil, Cahacterizing fracture and matrix heterogeneities in tight gas fields, Houston.

Лицензия Creative Commons
All articles posted on the site are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Global License.