Oleg Veniaminovich KOSOLAPOV, Vladimir Evgen’evich STROVSKIY

УДК 330.15


O. V. Kosolapov, V. E. Strovskiy / News of the Ural State Mining University. 2018. Issue 4(52), pp. 122-126

Relevance. Nowadays, the indisputable fact is the need to move to a new path of development, ensuring a balanced economy and ecology, which will prevent the destruction of civilization under the influence of an environmental crisis. This path is determined by the concept of sustainable development, which, as it is believed, can simultaneously solve two tasks: economic growth and nature conservation. However, twenty-six years on from the date of the Rio Conference (1992), there are no positive estimates regarding the implementation of the concept.
Purpose of the work is to determine the most likely areas of activity that contribute to the transition to a new path of development.
Results of the study. This paper clarifies the concept of sustainable development, provides the author’s definition, which focuses on the condition of maintaining the regulatory functions of ecosystems and the need to transform the consciousness of society in terms of its environmentalization. Some conceptual approaches and conditions for the implementation of a sustainable development model at the state level are displayed in a schematic form, reflecting the need to comply with environmental restrictions, population planning, limiting needs, environmental technology, improving the legal framework for sustainable development, etc. The target orientation of the subsystems of the ecological-economic system at the regional level is justified in relation to enterprises mastering the resources of the subsoil and the ecological-economic system itself, the expediency of combining the economic and social subsystems into a single socio-economic subsystem, as well as the requirement of consistency of man-induced load with the ecological technological intensity of the territory and civility for natural resource use.
Conclusions. The substantiated conditions for the transition to a new ecological and economic model of development at the level of public administration determine the main areas of activity that allow us to bring closer the moment of implementing the concept of sustainable development.

Keywords: concept, sustainable development, implementation, areas of activities, equation.




1. Dotsenko E., Ezdina N. 2018, Sustainable Subsoil Use as a Factor of Innovative Development of Mining Region. E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 41. 04048. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184104048
2. Pakhomova N. V., Rikhter K. К. 1999, Ekonomika prirodopol’zovaniya i ekologicheskiy menedzhment [Economics of nature use and environmental management]. Saint Petersburg, 488 p.
3. Corina Ana B. 2012, Management of Romanian natural resources. 12th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference and EXPO – Modern Management of Mine Producing, Geology and Environmental Protection, SGEM 2012. Bulgaria: Varna, vol. 4, pp. 1045–1050.
4. Danilov-Danilyan V. I., Losev K. S. 2000, Ekologicheskiy vyzov i ustoychivoye razvitiye [Environmental challenge and sustainable development], Moscow, 416 p.
5. Ursul A. D. 1998, Perekhod Rossii k ustoychivomu razvitiyu. Noosfernaya strategiya [Russia’s transition to sustainable development. Noospheric strategy]. Moscow, 500 p.
6. Hillerbrand M. 1997, Nachhaltige Entwicklung: Ein Leitbild für das 21. Jahrhundert. Standpunkte, vol. 10(4), pp. 26–29.
7. Munro D. A. (ed.) 1991, Caring for the Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living. 228 p.
8. Yashalova N. N. 2016, Genezis i perspektivy razvitiya kontseptsii ustoychivogo razvitiya [Genesis and development prospects of the concept of sustainable development]. Ekonomika prirodopol’zovaniya [Economics of nature use], no. 2, pp. 4–17.
9. Yagodin G. A., Purtova E. Е. 2001, Sustainable development: future of civilization. Ekologia i promyshlennost Rossii [Ecology and industry of Russia], no. 7, pp. 36–38. (In Russ.)
10. Zhigarev V. V. 2006, Global and regional aspects of sustainable development. Problemy regional’noy ekologii [Regional Environmental Issues], no. 6, pp. 67–72. (In Russ.)
11. Danilov-Danilyan V. I., Losev K. S. 1999, Iskhodnyye polozheniya ustoychivogo razvitiya [Premises for sustainable development]. Ustoychivoye razvitiye: obzornaya inf. [Sustainable development: precis articles], no. 4, pp. 3–9.
12. Akhatov A. 1998, Ekologo-ekonomicheskaya model’ Tatarstana i perekhod k ustoychivomu razvitiyu [Ecological and economic model of Tatarstan and the transition to sustainable development]. Ecology: population safety, collection of works. Kazan', pp. 79–92.
13. Kondratyev K. Ya. 2005, Problemy ustoychivogo razvitiya sovremennoy tsivilizatsii [Problems of sustainable development of modern
civilization]. Problemy okruzhayushchey sredy i prirodnykh resursov [Environmental and natural resource issues], no. 12, pp. 3–10.
14. Alferova T. V., Tretyakova E. А. 2012, Conceptual modeling of the category “sustainable development”. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [The Russian Journal of the Economic Theory], no. 4, pp. 46–52. (In Russ.)
15. Krausmann F., Schandl H., Eisenmenger N., Giljum S., Jackson T. 2017, Material Flow Accounting: Measuring Global Material Use for Sustainable Development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 42. pp. 647–675. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060726
16. Ignat'eva M. N., Kosolapov O. V. 2014, Essence of the concept “sustainable development”. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Gornyi zhurnal [News of the Higher Institutions. Mining Journal], no. 2, pp. 21–25. (In Russ.)
17. Riza S. P., Murtuzayeva M. 2012, Application saaty pair comparisons method to the investments distribution in parameters of ecological sustainability. Problems of Cybernetics and Informatics 2012: Proceedings of 4th International Conference, PCI 2012. Azerbaijan: Baku, pp. 214–216. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPCI.2012.6486490
18. Trubetskoy K. N., Galchenko Yu. L., Burtsev L. N. 2003, Ekologicheskiye problemy osvoyeniya nedr pri ustoychivom razvitii prirody i
obshchestva [Environmental problems of exploitation of mineral resources while sustainable development of nature and society]. Moscow, 262 p. 19. Wu G., Wei D., Zhou Z. D., Tang M. F., Fu, X. A. 2014, A summary of study on ecological restoration technology of large coal bases construction in China. Shengtai Xuebao / Acta Ecologica Sinica, vol. 34(11). (In Chinese). https://dx.doi.org/10.5846/stxb201308092052
20. Kaplan A. V. 2015, Upravleniye sotsial’no-ekonomicheskim razvitiyem gornodobyvayushchego predpriyatiya [Management of the socioeconomic development of the mining enterprise]. Moscow, 270 p.
21. Akimova T. A., Khaskin V. V. 2006, Ekologiya [Ecology]. Moscow, 495 p.
22. Popovich I. N. 2014, Sustainable development of coal industry as a priority of the state. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu [Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University], no. 2, pp. 30–35.
23. Hyle M. A. 2016, Conceptual reflection on responsive environmental governance. International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 39(8), pp. 610–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1034320


Лицензия Creative Commons
All articles posted on the site are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Global License.