Decision-making algorithm based on the results of systematic monitoring of forested landscapes in the subsoil use territories of the Urals

ISSN 2307-2091 (Print) 

ISSN 2500-2414 (Online)

 

T. A. Lebedeva / News of the Ural State Mining University. 2021. Issue 1(61), pp. 134-141

https://doi.org/10.21440/2307-2091-2021-1-134-141

 

Relevance of the study. Currently, information obtained during monitoring, including monitoring of forest lands, is
of particular importance for making informed decisions on the development of natural potential. A feature of these
works today is the lack of combination of data collection procedures, their processing with models of structural
elements of forest lands, which requires a solution to the problem under consideration.
The aim is to form, according to the results of system monitoring, a system of interconnected decision-making
algorithms in the field of forest land use in industrial regions. The methodology for the formation of a system of
interrelated decision-making algorithms in the field of forest land use in industrial regions is based on the use of
mathematical models of natural objects of forest ecosystems, natural phenomena in them and forest-forming
processes, on the procedures of a comprehensive assessment and optimization of forest land use in industrial regions
in accordance with current provisions of the concept of environmentally sustainable development of territories.
Results and their application. The algorithms for decision-making in the use of forest lands based on the results of
system monitoring are considered: substantiation of strategic indicators of sustainable development of forest lands in
industrial regions in the face of modern challenges and risks; comprehensive ecological and economic assessment of
the natural resource potential of forest lands; determination of leeways of permissible use of forest lands in industrial
regions in specific climatic and socio-economic conditions; coordination of individual interests of land users on
forest lands with public preferences for the development of industrial regions; multi-criteria optimization of the use
of forest lands in industrial regions. The main principles of forecasting the parameters of a comprehensive assessment
of forest lands, the use of the indicator of consumption of net primary products of forest ecosystems, the sequence
of greening the economy of the use of forest lands in industrial regions, justification of concessions to the extreme
values of particular criteria in multi-criteria optimization are given. The proposed additional indicators of sustainable
development of forest areas in the Middle Urals, the results of calculations on the change in the natural resource
potential of forest lands in the subsoil use area are presented; the substantiation of the multicriteria optimization of
the use of raw material resources of forest lands is given.
Conclusions. The proposed decision-making algorithms in the field of systemic monitoring of forest lands are
intellectual support for users in the analysis of information in the field of land relations. They provide a substantive
dialogue that allows you to form the necessary information in a user-friendly form, adjust the data processing process
and make decisions.

Keywords: system monitoring, forested landscapes, decision-making algorithms, strategic indicators, integrated assessment, leeways of land use, conflicts of interest, multi-criteria optimization.

 

REFERENCES

1. Lebedev Yu. V. 2011, Otsenka lesnykh ekosistem v ekonomike prirodopol’zovaniya [Assessment of forest ecosystems in environmental
economics]. Ekaterinburg, 583 p.
2. Sellers Р. J., Dickinson R. Е., Randall D. A., Betts А. К, Hall F. G.. Berry J. А.,Collati G. J., Denning A. S., Mooney H. A., Nobre C. A., Sato N.,
Field С. B., Henderson-Sellers A. 1997, Modeling the exchanges of energy, water, and carbon between continents and the atmosphere. Science,
vol. 275, pp. 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5299.502
3. Lebedev Yu. V. 2015, Methodology, principles and practice of forest ecosystem assessment. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Lesnoy
Zhurnal [Bulletin of Higher Educational Institutions. Russian Forestry Journal], no. 2, pp. 9–20. (In Russ.)
4. Krupinin N. Ya., Lebedeva T. A. 2015, Informatsionnoye obespecheniye otsenochnykh rabot po lesnym zemlyam Srednego Urala (territorii
nedropol’zovaniya) [Information support for appraisal works on forest lands of the Middle Urals (subsoil use territories)]. Ekaterinburg, 159 p.
5. 2008, Montreal Process: Criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests.
Lesokhozyaystvennaya informatsiya [Forestry Information], no. 10, pp. 89–96. (In Russ.)
6. Gorshkov V. G. 1995, Fizicheskiye i biologicheskiye osnovy ustoychivosti zhizni [Physical and biological foundations of life sustainability].
Moscow, 472 p.
7. Kondratyev K. Ya., Krapivin V. F., Varotsos C. A. 2003, Global Carbon Cycle and Climate Change. Chichester, U. K.: Springer Praxis Books, 343 p.
8. Krapivin V. F., Shutko A. M. 2012, Information technologies for remote monitoring of the environment. Chichester, U. K.: Springer Praxis Books,
498 р.
9. Walter L. L., Brecle S. W. 1985, Ecological systems of the geosphere. Berlin: Spfinger Verlag, 242 p.
10. Watson R. T., Noble I. R., Bolin B., Ravindranath N. H., Verardo D. J., Dokken D. J. 2000, Land use, Land-use change, and forestry.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 875 p.
11. Shuster A. M. 1969, Faktor vremeni v otsenke ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti kapital’nykh vlozheniy [The time factor in assessing the economic
efficiency of capital investments]. Moscow, 243 p.
12. Goffman K. G. 1974, Uchot faktora vremeni pri ekonomicheskoy otsenke lesnykh zemel’ [Actual time factor in the economic assessment of
forest lands]. Moscow, pp. 72–76.
13. Varankin V. V. 1974, Metodologicheskiye voprosy regional’noy otsenki prirodnykh resursov [Methodological issues of regional assessment of
natural resources]. Moscow, 239 p.
14. Kozhukhov N. I. 1988, Ekonomika vosproizvodstva lesnykh resursov [Economy ‑of forest resources reproduction]. Moscow, 262 p.
15. 2000, Methodology for the economic assessment of forests: Resolution no. 43 of 10.03.2000. Moscow, 31 p.
16. Methodology for the state cadastral valuation of forest lands in the Russian Federation. Approved by the Federal Land Registry on 15.04.2002,
no. P. 263, 49 p.
17. Peter H. Pearse. 1992, Introduction to Forestry Economics. Moscow, 224 p.
18. Danilov-Danilyan V. I., Losev K. S. 2000, Ekologicheskiy vyzov i ustoychivoye razvitiye [Environmental challenge and sustainable development].
Moscow, 416 p.
19. Losev K. S., Potapov I. I., Chesnokova I. V., Dokukina T. P. 2008, Externalities from the standpoint of modern ecology. Ekonomika
prirodopol’zovaniya [Environmental economics], no. 5, pp. 3–8. (In Russ.)
20. Gusev A. A. 2014, Ways to form a green economy in Russia. Ekonomika prirodopol’zovaniya [Environmental economics], no 1, pp. 28–36.
(In Russ.)
21. Robert M. Solow. 1974, The economics of resources or the resources of economics. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings of
the Eighty-sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 1–14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1816009
22. Lebedeva T. A., Kokovin P. A., Arefiev S. A. 2017, Scientific basis for sustainable land use in industrial regions. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh
zavedenii. Gornyi zhurnal [News of the Higher Institutions. Mining Journal], no. 4, pp. 19–27. (In Russ.)
23. Marchuk G. I. 1984, Environment and optimization problems. Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta imeni V. A. Steklova [Proceedings of the
Steklov Institute of Mathematics], vol. 166, pp. 123–129. (In Russ.)
24. Melentiev L. A. 1976, Optimizatsiya razvitiya i upravleniya bol’shikh sistem energetiki [Optimizing the development and management of large
energy systems]. Moscow, 320 p.
25. Popyrin L. S. 1978, Matematicheskoye modelirovaniye i optimizatsiya teploenergeticheskikh ustanovok [Mathematical modeling and
optimization of heat and power plants]. Moscow, 416 p.
26. Podolinsky S. A. 2005, Trud cheloveka i yego otnosheniye k raspredeleniyu energii [Human labor and its relationship to the distribution of
energy], edition 2. Moscow, 160 p.
27. Bolshakov V. N., Korytin N. S., Kryazhemsky F. V., Shishmarev V. M. 1998, A new approach to assessing the cost of biotic components of
ecosystems. Ekologiya [Ecology], no. 5, pp. 339‑448.
28. Fishburn P. C. 1974, Exceptional Paper – Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: a survey. Management science, vol. 20, no. 11,
pp. 1413–1496. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.20.11.1442
29. Grabovsky W. 1972, Lexicographic and time minimization in the transportation problem. Warszawa, 142 p.
30. Podinovsky V. V., Gavrilov V. M. 2016, Optimizatsiya po posledovatel’no primenyayemym kriteriyam [Optimization according to consistently
applied criteria]. Moscow, 192 p.
31. Lebedev Yu. V., Kokarev K. V. 2016, Resheniye mnogokriterial’nykh zadach v nedrpol’zovanii metodom posledovatel’nykh ustupok [The
solution of multicriteria problems in subsoil use by the method of successive concessions]. Innovative geotechnologies in the development of ore
and non-ore deposits: book of reports of the conference. Ekaterinburg, pp. 133–136.

Лицензия Creative Commons
All articles posted on the site are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Global License.