Home

DOI 10.21440/2307-2091-2017-2-104-108                                                                                     Publication Date 11.07.2017

CDIO concept as the basis of engineering education: interim results and directions for further use in Russia pdf

R. A. Dolzhenko

The author analyzes CDIO concept - a new integrated approach to engineering education, describes the history of its formation, presents interim results of its implementation in the national universities, as well as the directions for further use in the Russian Federation. The paper contains analysis of the dynamics of academic publications on the topic of CDIO in Russia and abroad, provides a list of foreign journals that highlightened this subject was the most, has the reviews of the most quoted scientific papers that reflect the content of CDIO initiative. The author describes the advantages of CDIO concept and the content of this approach to engineering education, which is spreading in foreign universities and appears in a number of Russian educational organizations. From the point of view of the creators of CDIO, this approach will help to educate such a future graduate of the university, who can come up with a new product or a new technical idea, carry out all the design work for its implementation, and introduce the result into production. The article also highlights a list of factors that hamper the development of CDIO in Russian pedagogical practice. The author proposes a set of recommendations and an algorithm for the introduction of this approach to the Russian university practice. In order to implement the CDIO in its practice, the university must first verify its activities for compliance with CDIO standards, which set out 12 directions for implementing this initiative and possible levels of their evaluation. The analysis showed that the formalized procedure for joining the CDIO association does not carry significant preferences for the educational organization, while CDIO open standards will improve its activities.

Keywords: education; engineering education; technical specialties; CDIO; education standards; publications.

 

REFERENCES


1. Crawley E. F., Brodeur D. R., Soderholm D. H. 2008, The education of future aeronautical engineers: Sonceiving, designing, implementing and operating. Journal of Science Education and Technology, no. 17(2), pp. 138–151.
2. Edström K., Kolmos A. 2014, PBL and CDIO: Complementary models for engineering education development. European Journal of Engineering Education, no. 39(5), pp. 539–555.
3. Lunev. A., Petrova. I., Zaripova. V. 2013, Competency-based models of learning for engineers: a comparison. European Journal of Engineering Education, no. 38(5), pp. 543–555.
4. Woollacott L. C. 2009, Validating the CDIO syllabus for engineering education using the taxonomy of engineering competencies. European Journal of Engineering Education, no. 34(6), pp. 545–559.
5. Padfield G. D. 2006, Flight handling qualities. Aeronautical Journal, no. 110(1104), pp. 73–84.
6. Wang Y., Qi Z., Li Z., Zhang L. 2011, Institute-industry interoperation model: An in-dustry-oriented engineering education strategy in China. Asia Pacific Education Review, no. 12(4), pp. 665–674.
7. Gafurova N. V., Osipova S. I. 2013, Metallurgicheskoe obrazovanie na osnove ideologii CDIO [Metallurgical education based on CDIO ideology]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], no. 12, pp. 137–139.
8. Chuchalin A. I. 2011, Modernizatsiya bakalavriata v oblasti tekhniki i tekhnologiy s uchetom mezhdunarodnykh standartov inzhenernogo obrazovaniya [Modernization of bachelor's degree in engineering and technology taking into account international standards of engineering education]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], no. 10, pp. 20–29.
9. Yakovlev A. N., Kostikov K. S., Martyushev N. V., Shepotenko N. A., Falkovich Yu. V. 2012, Institute of high technology physics experience in masters of engineering and doctoral training: the platform for cooperation with Russian and international companies in the domain of material science and physics of high-energy systems. Izv. vuzov. Fizika [Russian Physics Journal], vol. 55, no 11-3, pp. 261–263.
10. Zamyatina O. M., Mozgaleva P. I. 2013, Usovershenstvovanie programmy elitnoy tekhnicheskoy podgotovki: kompetentnostno-orientirovanyy podkhod [Improvement of the program of elite technical training: competence-oriented approach]. Innovatsii v obrazovanii [Innovation in Education], no. 10, pp. 36–45.
11. Mineva O. K., Akmaeva R. I., Usacheva L. V. 2013, Realizatsiya strategii razvitiya universiteta na osnove postroeniya strategicheskoy karty [Implementation of the university development strategy based on the construction of a strategic map]. Vestnik SGTU [Vestnik Saratov State Technical University], vol. 1, no. 1(69), pp. 297–304.
12. Chuchalin A. I. 2014, Modernizatsiya inzhenernogo obrazovaniya na osnove mezhdunarodnykh standartov CDIO [Modernization of engineering education on the basis of international CDIO standards]. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie [Engeneering Education], no. 16, pp. 14–29.
13. Kuptasthien N., Triwanapong S., Kanchana R. 2014, Razrabotka integrirovannogo uchebnogo plana dlya programm promyshlennoy inzhenerii v ramkakh initsiativy CDIO [Development of an integrated curriculum for industrial engineering programs under the CDIO initiative]. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie [Engeneering Education], no. 16, pp. 30–39.
14. Podlesnyy S. A., Kozlov A. V. 2014, CDIO: tseli i sredstva dostizheniya [CDIO: goals and means of achieving]. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie [Engeneering Education], no. 16, pp. 9–13.
15. Dushin A. V. 2009, Nekotorye aspekty razvitiya teorii tsennosti [Some aspects of the development of the theory of value]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], no. 3, pp. 218–222.

Лицензия Creative Commons
All articles posted on the site are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Global License.